350+ Reviews
5.0 Star Average
Understanding DUI Charges in South Carolina
Before diving into the defenses, it is important to have a general understanding of DUI charges in South Carolina. DUI stands for Driving Under the Influence, and in South Carolina, a person can be charged with a DUI if they are found to be operating a vehicle while impaired by alcohol or drugs. The legal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit in South Carolina is 0.08 percent for drivers 21 years and older. Drivers under the age of 21 can be charged with DUI if their BAC is 0.02 percent or higher. DUI charges can carry serious consequences, including fines, license suspension, and possible jail time, which is why it’s important to mount a strong defense. When you are an out-of-state driver, you may feel even more vulnerable because you are unfamiliar with how the South Carolina legal system works. However, it is important to know that your rights are the same as those of South Carolina residents, and there are several possible defenses that could help your case.Challenging the Stop or Arrest
One of the most common and effective defenses in DUI cases is challenging the stop or arrest made by the police. In South Carolina, law enforcement must have a valid reason to stop your vehicle. This means that an officer cannot stop you simply because you are from out of state. There must be reasonable suspicion or probable cause for the stop. For example, if the officer claims to have stopped you due to erratic driving but cannot prove it with evidence such as dashcam footage or testimony from a witness, the stop may be deemed unlawful.
Field Sobriety Tests and Breathalyzer Issues
Field sobriety tests are commonly used by law enforcement officers to assess whether a driver is under the influence of alcohol or drugs. These tests include activities such as walking in a straight line or standing on one leg. While these tests are meant to be used as indicators of impairment, they are not always reliable. Several factors, such as medical conditions, fatigue, or even weather conditions, can influence a person’s ability to perform these tests correctly. Similarly, breathalyzer tests are often used to determine a driver’s BAC. However, breathalyzer machines are not infallible, and several issues can affect their accuracy. For example, if the machine was not calibrated correctly or if the officer did not follow proper procedure during the test, the results could be inaccurate. Additionally, if the breathalyzer test was administered too soon or too late after your stop, it may not accurately reflect your BAC at the time you were driving. Both of these tests—field sobriety tests and breathalyzer tests—can be challenged in court if there are inconsistencies or errors. If the court finds that the tests were not conducted properly or that they were unreliable, the evidence from these tests may be inadmissible, which can lead to a reduction or dismissal of the charges."He has an innate ability to convey to clients what really matters in their cases."
"John Bateman is my absolute go to peer in the legal field when it comes to questions about DUI. . . . He has an innate ability to convey to clients what really matters in their cases. As a fellow attorney, I highly recommend John to anyone in the SC or NC areas who are looking for... legal representation when facing a DUI charge."
M. Brock
"An excellent DUI attorney. He has received the same field sobriety test training as all police officers in the State"
"John is an excellent DUI attorney. He has received the same field sobriety test training as all police officers in the State, and also the same training as the people who are the instructors of the police officer training courses on field sobriety tests. He is very passionate about DUI's and I recommend him often to people who are facing serious charges in the upstate area."
P. Hammond
"He cares for each of his clients and works extremely hard to achieve results."
"Very knowledgeable and thorough in his preparation and representation of his clients. He cares for each of his clients and works extremely hard to achieve results. I highly recommend this lawyer."
C. Grubbs
The Reliability of the Officer’s Observations
In many DUI cases, the prosecution will rely heavily on the observations of the arresting officer to prove that a driver was impaired. This can include observations such as the driver’s speech, the smell of alcohol, or their behavior during the stop. While officer observations can be persuasive, they are also subjective. An officer’s interpretation of your behavior or appearance may not necessarily reflect the reality of the situation. For example, the officer might claim that you were slurring your speech or stumbling when you were not. You might also be accused of smelling like alcohol, even though you were not drinking. These subjective observations can be challenged in court, especially if there is conflicting evidence, such as witness testimony or surveillance footage, that shows you were not impaired at the time of the stop. In cases where the officer’s observations are questionable or unreliable, it may be possible to argue that the DUI charge should be dismissed.Lack of Jurisdiction
Another important consideration for out-of-state drivers is the issue of jurisdiction. In most DUI cases, the state in which the offense occurred has jurisdiction over the case. However, if you are charged with a DUI in South Carolina but are from another state, there may be potential issues with how the case is handled. For example, if there are disputes over the procedures followed by law enforcement or if the case involves complex out-of-state legal questions, your lawyer may be able to argue that the case should be dismissed or transferred to another jurisdiction.Related Videos
Refusing Field Sobriety Tests
Choosing a DUI Attorney