350+ Reviews
5.0 Star Average
Understanding How Video Evidence Is Used in DUI Arrests 
Video evidence in DUI cases can come in various forms, from dash cams in police vehicles to body cameras worn by officers. In some cases, DUI checkpoints are equipped with stationary cameras to monitor the flow of traffic and capture driver behavior. Here’s how video evidence typically factors into DUI cases: - Justification for the Stop: Often, the first thing captured on video is the reason for the traffic stop. This may include footage showing erratic driving behaviors such as swerving, running red lights, speeding, or failing to signal. The video helps establish the officer’s justification for pulling over the vehicle in the first place.
- Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs): Once a driver is stopped, the officer may ask them to perform a series of field sobriety tests. These tests are designed to assess a driver’s coordination, balance, and overall ability to operate a vehicle safely. Video evidence from these tests can be a key component in determining whether the officer’s observations of impairment are valid.
- Breathalyzer Tests and Chemical Analysis: If a driver agrees to or is forced to take a breathalyzer test, the video may capture the moment of testing. In some cases, the video may even record the driver’s reaction to the results, which can be important when challenging the accuracy or validity of the test.
- Statements and Behavior: Video footage may also capture any statements made by the driver during the interaction with law enforcement. This includes responses to officer questions or comments made about their condition, which may be used to assess whether the driver appeared intoxicated. Additionally, the video might show the driver’s demeanor—whether they were calm, confused, belligerent, or uncooperative.
How to Challenge DUI Video Evidence
While video footage can seem like a solid piece of evidence, it’s important to remember that all evidence, including video, can be challenged. In fact, video evidence is often contested in DUI cases. Here’s how defense attorneys may challenge the use of video footage:- Poor Video Quality: One of the most common challenges is the quality of the video. Dash cams or body cameras can sometimes produce blurry or low-quality footage, which can make it difficult to clearly see what’s happening. If the video doesn’t clearly show the driver’s actions or behavior, a defense attorney may argue that the footage is unreliable and should be dismissed.
- Unclear Behavior or Actions: Field sobriety tests, in particular, are often captured on video. However, there are many factors—such as poor lighting, angle of the camera, or even the driver’s health—that could affect how the test appears on video. For example, a driver who is nervous or tired may stumble during the test, which could be mistaken for intoxication. If the video doesn’t accurately reflect the circumstances, it can be challenged.
- Chain of Custody Issues: Video evidence must be handled properly to ensure its integrity. If the footage is altered, tampered with, or not properly stored, its validity can be questioned. A defense attorney may ask to see the video’s chain of custody to ensure it hasn’t been modified in any way. If there’s any suspicion that the video has been tampered with, it could be ruled inadmissible.
- Misleading Footage: In some cases, the footage may be selectively edited or may not show the full interaction between the officer and the driver. For example, the camera may only capture the part of the field sobriety test where the driver stumbles, but fail to show earlier moments where the driver demonstrated normal behavior. A defense attorney may argue that the selective presentation of the video misrepresents the driver’s condition.
- Inaccuracy in Officer Testimony: Even if the video captures behavior that seems to suggest impairment, it’s essential to examine the officer’s testimony. Was the officer’s interpretation of the video accurate? Did the officer follow proper procedures when administering the tests? If there are inconsistencies between the officer’s testimony and the video, the defense can use this to cast doubt on the prosecution’s case.
"He has an innate ability to convey to clients what really matters in their cases."
"John Bateman is my absolute go to peer in the legal field when it comes to questions about DUI. . . . He has an innate ability to convey to clients what really matters in their cases. As a fellow attorney, I highly recommend John to anyone in the SC or NC areas who are looking for... legal representation when facing a DUI charge."
M. Brock
"An excellent DUI attorney. He has received the same field sobriety test training as all police officers in the State"
"John is an excellent DUI attorney. He has received the same field sobriety test training as all police officers in the State, and also the same training as the people who are the instructors of the police officer training courses on field sobriety tests. He is very passionate about DUI's and I recommend him often to people who are facing serious charges in the upstate area."
P. Hammond
"He cares for each of his clients and works extremely hard to achieve results."
"Very knowledgeable and thorough in his preparation and representation of his clients. He cares for each of his clients and works extremely hard to achieve results. I highly recommend this lawyer."
C. Grubbs
When Is Video Evidence Inadmissible in a DUI Case?
While video evidence can be powerful, it is not automatically admissible in court. There are several circumstances under which video footage may be excluded from the trial:- Violation of Rights: If the video footage was obtained in violation of the driver’s rights—such as a stop without reasonable suspicion or a search without consent—the footage may be deemed inadmissible. For example, if the video shows the officer failing to inform the driver of their right to remain silent or the right to refuse a field sobriety test, this could lead to the exclusion of the evidence.
- Unlawful Stop or Search: In some cases, video footage may show that the driver was stopped without reasonable suspicion or arrested without probable cause. If the video does not provide sufficient justification for the stop or search, the defense may argue that the entire arrest was unlawful, making the video evidence inadmissible.
- Improper Procedure: Video footage can also be excluded if it shows that the officer did not follow proper procedures during the arrest. For example, if the officer failed to properly administer a breathalyzer test or did not observe the driver for the required period of time before the test, the video may be excluded as evidence of an improperly conducted test.
- Failure to Preserve Evidence: In some situations, video footage may be inadvertently deleted or lost, either by technical failure or human error. If the video is no longer available for the defense to review, it may be excluded from the trial.
Related Videos
Refusing Field Sobriety Tests
Choosing a DUI Attorney
What to Do if You’ve Been Arrested at a DUI Checkpoint
If you’ve been arrested at a holiday DUI checkpoint in South Carolina, it’s essential to take immediate action. While video evidence may play a significant role in your case, there are several steps you can take to protect your rights and improve your chances of a successful defense:- Seek Legal Representation: One of the first things you should do after an arrest is contact a qualified DUI defense attorney. A skilled attorney will know how to review video evidence and identify potential weaknesses in the prosecution’s case.
- Request Discovery: Your attorney can request discovery, which includes all the evidence the prosecution plans to use against you, including any video footage. This allows your lawyer to analyze the footage thoroughly before the trial.
- Challenge the Evidence: If video evidence is part of your case, your lawyer may challenge it based on factors such as poor quality, chain of custody issues, or improper handling of the evidence.
- Prepare for Court: If your case goes to trial, your attorney will prepare a defense strategy that includes challenging video evidence, questioning the officer’s conduct, and presenting any other favorable evidence in your favor.