Drunk Driving Injury

Can You Fight a Drunk Driving Injury Case with Faulty Breathalyzer Evidence?

When it comes to drunk driving injury cases, Breathalyzer test results often play a central role in determining fault. However, Breathalyzer evidence is not always as straightforward or reliable as it may seem. There are various reasons why a Breathalyzer test may provide faulty results, leading to possible defenses that can challenge the evidence. If you or a loved one is involved in a case involving faulty Breathalyzer evidence, understanding how this evidence works, why it can fail, and what you can do to fight it can be crucial to the outcome of your case. At, The Bateman Law Firm , we are here to guide you through the legal process and help you navigate the complexities of your case.

350+ Reviews
5.0 Star Average

avvo clients choice-DUI

Understanding Breathalyzer Tests

Breathalyzer tests are devices used by law enforcement officers to measure the blood alcohol concentration, or BAC, of a person suspected of driving under the influence. The device works by analyzing a breath sample and calculating an estimated BAC level. If the result shows a level above the legal limit of 0.08% BAC, it often serves as evidence of impaired driving. The purpose of a Breathalyzer test is to provide quick and easy information to help officers make decisions about drivers’ levels of impairment. While these tests are widely used, they are not foolproof. Various factors can lead to incorrect results, which is why it’s possible to challenge Breathalyzer evidence in court.

Reasons Breathalyzer Evidence May Be Faulty

There are many situations where a Breathalyzer test may produce inaccurate results. Understanding these possible causes of faulty evidence can help to determine if the test results are truly reliable. One of the main reasons a Breathalyzer may fail to provide an accurate result is improper calibration. For a Breathalyzer device to work correctly, it needs regular calibration and maintenance. If a device is not calibrated according to the manufacturer’s standards, it can overestimate or underestimate BAC levels. This could lead to a false result, potentially indicating someone was over the legal limit when they were not.

John Bateman

Scotty Roberson

Kaycee Dancy

Anna Mehr

 Environmental factors can also affect Breathalyzer readings. Exposure to substances like paint fumes, cleaning agents, or even mouthwash could influence results. These substances contain alcohol or similar chemicals that may create a reading even if the driver is not impaired. Sometimes, physiological conditions such as acid reflux or diabetes can lead to inaccurate Breathalyzer results as well. In cases where a driver has a medical condition, the device may pick up more alcohol content in their breath than is actually present in their blood. The way a person breathes before taking the test can also impact the result. For instance, holding one’s breath or blowing forcefully can cause a higher BAC reading. Since these factors are often beyond a driver’s control, they can lead to unfair test results and possible misinterpretations by law enforcement.

Legal Defenses Against Faulty Breathalyzer Evidence

If you believe that Breathalyzer evidence in your case may be faulty, there are several possible legal defenses that could be used to challenge the validity of the test results. The goal of these defenses is to create doubt about the reliability of the test evidence, which may weaken the case against you.

"He has an innate ability to convey to clients what really matters in their cases."

"John Bateman is my absolute go to peer in the legal field when it comes to questions about DUI. . . . He has an innate ability to convey to clients what really matters in their cases. As a fellow attorney, I highly recommend John to anyone in the SC or NC areas who are looking for... legal representation when facing a DUI charge."

M. Brock

"An excellent DUI attorney. He has received the same field sobriety test training as all police officers in the State"

"John is an excellent DUI attorney. He has received the same field sobriety test training as all police officers in the State, and also the same training as the people who are the instructors of the police officer training courses on field sobriety tests. He is very passionate about DUI's and I recommend him often to people who are facing serious charges in the upstate area."

P. Hammond

"He cares for each of his clients and works extremely hard to achieve results."

"Very knowledgeable and thorough in his preparation and representation of his clients. He cares for each of his clients and works extremely hard to achieve results. I highly recommend this lawyer."

C. Grubbs

Read More Reviews
One way to challenge Breathalyzer evidence is by questioning the device’s calibration and maintenance records. Courts often require proof that the Breathalyzer was calibrated and maintained correctly. If the records do not show proper maintenance, a judge may rule the evidence inadmissible. Likewise, if the officer administering the test was not properly trained, it could affect the reliability of the results. Another potential defense involves pointing out environmental or physiological factors that may have caused a false positive. For example, if the driver had recently used a product containing alcohol or had a health condition that impacted the test, these facts could be presented to explain the unusual reading. In addition, the timing of the Breathalyzer test can also be a defense point. If the test was administered too long after the alleged incident, the driver’s BAC could have changed from the time of the incident to the time of the test. Alcohol takes time to metabolize, so a higher BAC reading later on does not necessarily mean the driver was over the legal limit while they were driving.

The Role of a Lawyer in Challenging Breathalyzer Evidence

Fighting a drunk driving injury case with faulty Breathalyzer evidence requires a clear legal strategy, often involving careful analysis and testimony. A skilled lawyer can examine the details surrounding the Breathalyzer test and help determine if there are grounds to challenge its accuracy. A lawyer may request all records related to the Breathalyzer’s maintenance and the officer’s training. They may also interview witnesses and seek out specialists who can explain how factors such as calibration errors, medical conditions, or environmental elements might have affected the test result. If faulty Breathalyzer evidence is successfully challenged, it can significantly impact the case. Without a reliable test to prove intoxication, the evidence against the accused driver may weaken, leading to a more favorable outcome.

Related Videos

Refusing Field Sobriety Tests

Choosing a DUI Attorney

Other Considerations in Drunk Driving Cases

While Breathalyzer evidence plays a significant role in many drunk driving cases, other forms of evidence also come into play. Police officers may rely on observations such as slurred speech, unsteady movements, and the smell of alcohol. However, these observations are often subjective and may not always provide a full picture of impairment. Video footage from a police car or body camera can sometimes provide additional context. In some cases, this footage shows a driver behaving normally, which can counter the officer’s observations. Witness testimony can also offer perspectives on the driver’s behavior, which may be used to dispute claims of impairment. Given the complexity of drunk driving cases, it is important to consider all forms of evidence. When Breathalyzer evidence is in doubt, other evidence can either support or weaken the claims of intoxication. Working with a lawyer who understands how to examine all aspects of a drunk driving case can be essential.

How Courts View Faulty Breathalyzer Evidence

Courts understand that Breathalyzer tests are not perfect. If there is evidence that a Breathalyzer result may be inaccurate, a judge may decide to exclude the test from the case. Without this evidence, the prosecution may need to rely on other forms of evidence, such as officer observations or witness accounts, to establish intoxication. Judges may allow Breathalyzer evidence with a warning to the jury about its possible faults. In these situations, the jury can consider the evidence but must also take into account the arguments against its accuracy. This often happens when the defense has presented reasonable arguments but cannot entirely disprove the test’s validity. Each court handles Breathalyzer evidence differently based on local laws and the specifics of the case. A lawyer familiar with the local courts can guide you through these challenges, helping you understand how to present your case and how judges in your area tend to view faulty Breathalyzer evidence.

Moving Forward After a Drunk Driving Injury Case

Drunk driving cases are challenging for everyone involved. For victims of drunk driving, proving fault can be essential for seeking compensation for injuries and damages. However, when Breathalyzer evidence is questionable, the path to justice can be less clear. Faulty evidence can lead to lengthy legal battles and require skilled representation to ensure that the truth comes to light. Whether you are the driver accused of causing a drunk driving injury or a victim seeking justice, a strong understanding of the role of Breathalyzer evidence can be helpful. Knowing what can go wrong with a Breathalyzer test and what defenses may be available can impact the outcome of a case. It is important to remember that Breathalyzer results are only one piece of the puzzle in a drunk driving case. If you or someone you know is facing a drunk driving injury case involving questionable Breathalyzer evidence, the team at The Bateman Law Firm is ready to assist. Our experienced attorneys understand the complexities of these cases and know how to challenge faulty Breathalyzer evidence effectively. Don’t navigate this challenging situation alone; reach out to The Bateman Law Firm today for the support you need. Let us help you fight for the justice and resolution you deserve.