In South Carolina, being pulled over by law enforcement on suspicion of driving under the influence (DUI) is a serious matter. One of the tools officers use to determine if a driver is impaired is the field sobriety test (FST). These tests, often administered on the roadside, are designed to evaluate a driver’s physical and cognitive abilities. However, the results of these tests can be highly subjective and prone to various inaccuracies. Understanding how to challenge these results is crucial for anyone facing DUI charges in South Carolina.
350+ Reviews
5.0 Star Average
What are Field Sobriety Tests?
Field sobriety tests typically consist of three main components: the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test, the Walk-and-Turn test, and the One-Leg Stand test. Each of these tests requires the driver to perform specific physical tasks that purportedly reveal signs of impairment. However, several factors can influence the outcomes of these tests, and it is essential to scrutinize the conditions under which they were administered.
The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test involves an officer observing the driver’s eyes as they follow a moving object, such as a pen or flashlight. The officer looks for involuntary jerking of the eyes, which is more pronounced when a person is under the influence of alcohol. However, this test is highly dependent on the officer’s ability to accurately detect subtle eye movements. Other factors, such as certain medical conditions, fatigue, or even the flashing lights of the police vehicle, can cause eye movements that mimic those of alcohol impairment. Challenging the results of the HGN test often involves questioning the officer’s training and experience in administering the test, as well as presenting evidence of alternative explanations for the observed eye movements.
The Walk-and-Turn test requires the driver to take nine heel-to-toe steps along a straight line, turn on one foot, and return in the same manner. The officer looks for signs of imbalance, such as stepping off the line, using arms for balance, or an inability to follow instructions. This test can be particularly challenging for individuals with certain physical conditions, injuries, or even those who are simply nervous or uncoordinated. Additionally, the test’s accuracy can be compromised by uneven or slippery surfaces, poor lighting, or adverse weather conditions. An effective defense against the Walk-and-Turn test results might include providing medical records, questioning the environmental conditions, or presenting testimony on the unreliability of the test under specific circumstances.
The One-Leg Stand test involves the driver standing on one foot while counting aloud for thirty seconds. The officer observes for swaying, using arms for balance, hopping, or putting the foot down. Like the Walk-and-Turn test, this test can be influenced by various physical and environmental factors. Older individuals, those with balance issues, or people with certain medical conditions may naturally struggle with this test. Moreover, the anxiety of being stopped by the police can exacerbate these difficulties. To challenge the One-Leg Stand test results, it is important to highlight any medical or physical conditions, the conditions under which the test was administered, and the inherent subjectivity of the officer’s observations.
Legal Administration
In South Carolina, the administration of field sobriety tests must adhere to specific guidelines set forth by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Any deviation from these protocols can call into question the validity of the test results. For instance, the NHTSA mandates that tests be conducted on a level, well-lit surface and that the officer provides clear instructions and demonstrations. If these conditions are not met, it provides grounds for challenging the results. Additionally, the officer’s behavior and professionalism during the stop can also be scrutinized. Any signs of bias, improper conduct, or failure to follow procedural protocols can undermine the credibility of the field sobriety test results.
FST Subjectivity
Another critical aspect to consider is the subjective nature of field sobriety tests. Unlike chemical tests, which provide quantifiable data, FSTs rely heavily on the officer’s judgment and interpretation. This subjectivity opens the door for various biases and errors. For example, an officer who already suspects the driver of being intoxicated may inadvertently interpret innocent behaviors as signs of impairment. Furthermore, fatigue, stress, or nervousness can affect a driver’s performance, leading to false positives. Highlighting these subjective elements is a key strategy in challenging FST results.
"John Bateman is my absolute go to peer in the legal field when it comes to questions about DUI. . . . He has an innate ability to convey to clients what really matters in their cases. As a fellow attorney, I highly recommend John to anyone in the SC or NC areas who are looking for... legal representation when facing a DUI charge." "John is an excellent DUI attorney. He has received the same field sobriety test training as all police officers in the State, and also the same training as the people who are the instructors of the police officer training courses on field sobriety tests. He is very passionate about DUI's and I recommend him often to people who are facing serious charges in the upstate area." "Very knowledgeable and thorough in his preparation and representation of his clients. He cares for each of his clients and works extremely hard to achieve results. I highly recommend this lawyer.""He has an innate ability to convey to clients what really matters in their cases."
M. Brock
"An excellent DUI attorney. He has received the same field sobriety test training as all police officers in the State"
P. Hammond
"He cares for each of his clients and works extremely hard to achieve results."
C. Grubbs
Video Evidence
It is essential to consider the role of video evidence in challenging field sobriety test results. Many police vehicles are equipped with dashboard cameras that record the entire traffic stop, including the administration of FSTs. This footage can be invaluable in disputing the officer’s testimony. For instance, the video might show that the driver performed the tests adequately or that the officer did not administer the tests correctly. Obtaining and reviewing this footage is a crucial step in building a strong defense against DUI charges.
Witness Testimony
In addition to video evidence, witness testimony can play a significant role in challenging field sobriety test results. Passengers in the vehicle or bystanders who observed the traffic stop can provide accounts that contradict the officer’s observations. Their testimonies can offer an alternative perspective and reinforce the argument that the FST results were inaccurate or improperly interpreted. It is important to gather as much supporting evidence as possible to present a comprehensive and compelling case.
Seeking Legal Representation
When faced with DUI charges in South Carolina, it is imperative to seek legal representation from a law firm with a deep understanding of DUI laws and the intricacies of field sobriety tests. The Bateman Law Firm is dedicated to providing robust defense strategies for individuals charged with DUI. Our attorneys have extensive experience in challenging field sobriety test results and are committed to protecting your rights throughout the legal process.
Refusing Field Sobriety Tests Choosing a DUI AttorneyRelated Videos
Defending Drivers’ Rights
At The Bateman Law Firm, we understand that every DUI case is unique and requires a personalized approach. Our team will meticulously review the details of your case, including the circumstances of the traffic stop, the administration of the field sobriety tests, and any available evidence. We will work diligently to identify any weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and build a strong defense on your behalf. Our goal is to achieve the best possible outcome for you, whether that involves negotiating a reduced charge, securing a dismissal, or preparing a vigorous defense for trial.
Challenging the results of a field sobriety test in South Carolina is a complex and multifaceted process. It requires a thorough understanding of the law, keen attention to detail, and a strategic approach to presenting evidence. The Bateman Law Firm is here to guide you through this challenging time and provide the legal representation you need. If you are facing DUI charges, do not hesitate to contact us for a consultation. Together, we can navigate the legal system and work towards protecting your future.
At The Bateman Law Firm, we believe in fighting for justice and seeing to it that every client receives the fair treatment they deserve. Our attorneys are passionate about defending your rights and are prepared to challenge field sobriety test results with tenacity and experience. Contact us today to schedule a consultation and take the first step towards a strong defense. Your future is too important to leave to chance — let us be your advocate in this critical time.