Understanding Breathalyzer Tests and How They Work
A breathalyzer test measures the amount of alcohol in a person’s breath, then converts it to a number that shows blood alcohol concentration (BAC). In South Carolina, a BAC of 0.08 percent or higher is often enough for a DUI charge. Police use breathalyzers because they are quick and easy to use, and they can show if a person has alcohol in their system. However, breathalyzers are machines, and machines are not perfect. They can have errors or issues, just like any other device. Many things can affect a breathalyzer’s reading. For example, the way the machine is handled and the conditions when it is used can change the results. Additionally, certain factors about a person’s body and their health can also impact the reading. Because of these reasons, breathalyzer results are not always accurate, and this can be used as a defense in court.Common Issues With Breathalyzer Tests
One way to defend against breathalyzer evidence in a DUI case is to show that the test results might be incorrect. There are many reasons why a breathalyzer might give a reading that does not reflect a person’s true BAC. For example, the machine might not have been calibrated, or adjusted, correctly. Calibration is the process of making sure that a breathalyzer is measuring correctly. If a breathalyzer has not been calibrated, it might give an inaccurate reading. Police officers are supposed to check and calibrate these devices regularly, but if they fail to do so, the results may not be reliable.Problems With How the Breathalyzer Test Was Given
Sometimes, the issue with breathalyzer results is not the machine itself but how the test was given. For a breathalyzer test to be reliable, it must be given in a certain way. Police officers are trained on how to use these machines, but mistakes can still happen. For instance, the officer is supposed to observe the person being tested for a certain period before giving the test. This is to make sure that the person does not put anything in their mouth that could affect the results. However, if the officer did not watch the person closely or for the required time, the test results might be called into question.Arguing That the Breathalyzer Test Was Not Necessary
In some cases, it may be possible to argue that the police should not have given the breathalyzer test at all. For a police officer to give a breathalyzer test, they usually need to have a reason to believe that a person is under the influence of alcohol. If the officer did not have a good reason to suspect that the person had been drinking, then the test might have been given without proper cause. This could make the test results invalid in court. One way to show that the breathalyzer test was unnecessary is to examine the events that led up to the test. For instance, if the officer pulled someone over without a good reason, this could be an example of an unlawful stop. Police must have a reason, such as observing a traffic violation, before stopping someone’s car. If they did not have a valid reason, then the stop itself might be illegal, which could make the breathalyzer evidence invalid as well.Questioning the Officer’s Training and Knowledge
Challenging the breathalyzer evidence may also involve questioning the training of the officer who gave the test. Police officers in South Carolina are required to have specific training before they can use a breathalyzer machine. This training helps them know how to operate the machine correctly and what to look for when giving the test. If an officer did not complete their training or did not follow the correct procedures, this could raise doubts about the breathalyzer results.Related Videos
Refusing Field Sobriety Tests
Choosing a DUI Attorney













