In South Carolina, being charged with Boating Under the Influence (BUI) is a serious matter. These cases often come with heavy penalties and could even lead to jail time if not handled properly. It’s crucial to understand how BUI cases are approached in court and what defenses might be available. If someone is facing a BUI charge, they need to be prepared to present a strong defense to protect their rights, freedom, and future. Many factors come into play in BUI cases, and having the right defense strategy can make a major difference in the outcome.
At,The Bateman Law Firm , we are here to guide you through the legal process and help you navigate the complexities of your case.
350+ Reviews
5.0 Star Average
Understanding Boating Under the Influence in South Carolina
Boating Under the Influence (BUI) is the charge when someone is operating a boat or any watercraft while their ability is impaired by alcohol or drugs. The laws regarding BUI in South Carolina are strict and similar to those related to driving under the influence on the roads. According to South Carolina law, a person can be charged with BUI if they have a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08 percent or higher. In some cases, a person can be charged with BUI even if their BAC is below 0.08 percent, especially if it can be shown that alcohol or drugs influenced their ability to operate the vessel safely.
There are serious consequences tied to a BUI conviction in South Carolina. These consequences range from fines and loss of boating privileges to potential jail time, depending on the details of the offense and whether it is a repeat violation. Because the stakes are so high, anyone facing these charges should be aware of possible defenses that can help protect their rights in court.
Challenging the Stop or Arrest
One common defense in BUI cases is to challenge the reason behind the stop or arrest. Law enforcement officers need a legitimate reason to stop someone and investigate a potential BUI. In many cases, they should have observed some specific signs of impaired boating, such as erratic movements, speeding, or failing to follow boating regulations. However, if there is no clear reason for the stop, it may be possible to argue that the officer did not have enough cause to conduct the stop in the first place. If this is proven, any evidence collected during the stop could be ruled inadmissible, making it harder for the prosecution to prove the charges.
In addition to the reason for the stop, the procedure for the arrest must also be carefully reviewed. Law enforcement officers must follow certain guidelines and procedures when conducting an arrest for BUI. If these procedures were not followed, or if the officer made any errors, it could be possible to use that information in the defense. Mistakes in the arrest process, including issues with how the suspect was informed of their rights, could help reduce the impact of the evidence against them or even result in a dismissal of the case.
Questioning the Accuracy of BAC Tests
In BUI cases, a significant amount of weight is placed on the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) tests. However, these tests are not always foolproof. BAC tests may yield inaccurate results due to a number of factors. For example, problems with the equipment used for testing or errors in administering the test can affect the reliability of the results. Sometimes, the machines used to measure BAC are not properly calibrated or maintained, which can lead to inaccurate readings. Even small variations in machine performance can impact BAC results, making them unreliable.
Another factor that can affect BAC results is the timing of the test. Alcohol levels in the bloodstream can rise or fall based on many factors, including the time between consuming alcohol and when the test is taken. In some cases, a person’s BAC might be higher at the time of testing than it was while they were actually operating the boat. This is known as the “rising BAC” defense, where it is argued that the person’s BAC level rose between the time they were stopped and the time the test was conducted. Using these types of challenges against BAC evidence can sometimes weaken the prosecution’s case.
Challenging Field Sobriety Tests
In BUI cases, field sobriety tests are often used to determine whether someone is impaired. These tests involve tasks that are supposed to reveal signs of impairment, such as walking in a straight line, touching one’s nose, or standing on one foot. However, field sobriety tests are not always accurate, especially on a boat. Boats move in the water, creating a naturally unstable environment that can make it harder for someone to pass these tests even if they are sober.
Because of the unique conditions on the water, it’s often possible to argue that the results of field sobriety tests should not be given much weight in BUI cases. Motion from waves, slippery decks, or even the movements of other people on the boat can affect a person’s balance and coordination. In these cases, a defense can point out that the person’s performance on the test was influenced by factors beyond their control, not by intoxication. By questioning the reliability of field sobriety tests, the defense can sometimes reduce the impact of this evidence.
"John Bateman is my absolute go to peer in the legal field when it comes to questions about DUI. . . . He has an innate ability to convey to clients what really matters in their cases. As a fellow attorney, I highly recommend John to anyone in the SC or NC areas who are looking for... legal representation when facing a DUI charge." "John is an excellent DUI attorney. He has received the same field sobriety test training as all police officers in the State, and also the same training as the people who are the instructors of the police officer training courses on field sobriety tests. He is very passionate about DUI's and I recommend him often to people who are facing serious charges in the upstate area." "Very knowledgeable and thorough in his preparation and representation of his clients. He cares for each of his clients and works extremely hard to achieve results. I highly recommend this lawyer.""He has an innate ability to convey to clients what really matters in their cases."
M. Brock
"An excellent DUI attorney. He has received the same field sobriety test training as all police officers in the State"
P. Hammond
"He cares for each of his clients and works extremely hard to achieve results."
C. Grubbs
Medical Conditions and Physical Factors
In some cases, medical conditions or physical factors can be used to defend against BUI charges. Certain medical conditions, such as inner ear issues, can affect a person’s balance and coordination, which may cause them to fail sobriety tests even when they are not impaired. Other conditions, like diabetes, can cause symptoms that mimic intoxication, such as confusion or a lack of coordination. People with these conditions might appear to be under the influence, but their symptoms could actually be related to their medical issues.
A defense attorney may present evidence of these medical conditions to explain why the individual seemed impaired when they were actually sober. Sometimes, bringing medical specialists into the case to explain these symptoms can help the court understand that the person was not actually under the influence. Additionally, physical factors, such as sun exposure, dehydration, and even seasickness, can impact how a person behaves on a boat and might explain symptoms that are often mistaken for impairment.
Environmental and External Factors
When someone is boating, they are dealing with a very different environment than when they are on the road. The effects of wind, sun, motion of the waves, and temperature can all affect a person’s physical behavior and reactions. Prolonged sun exposure, for instance, can lead to fatigue or even mild dehydration, which might make someone seem unsteady on their feet. High temperatures can make people feel drowsy or confused, which could lead to misunderstandings about their level of sobriety.
Additionally, boating itself can be physically tiring, as people tend to exert a lot of energy in handling the vessel and staying balanced on the water. In BUI cases, a defense may argue that environmental factors contributed to the person’s physical signs of impairment. By explaining how these natural elements can affect behavior, the defense might be able to convince the court that any signs of impairment were not necessarily due to alcohol or drugs.
Refusing Field Sobriety Tests Choosing a DUI AttorneyRelated Videos
Proving Lack of Control Over the Vessel
Another defense in a BUI case is proving that the accused was not in control of the vessel. To convict someone of BUI, the prosecution must prove that they were operating or controlling the boat. In some cases, the person accused of BUI might not have been the one in charge. They could have been a passenger or might not have had direct control over the boat’s movements.
For example, if someone was steering the boat while another person was helping with navigation or other tasks, it might be argued that the accused was not truly “operating” the vessel under South Carolina law. In such situations, a defense could be presented to show that the accused was not responsible for the boat’s operation and therefore should not be held liable for the BUI charge. This can sometimes help reduce the charges or even result in a dismissal of the case.
Lack of Evidence
In any criminal case, including BUI, the burden of proof is on the prosecution. This means they must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused was guilty. In some cases, the defense might argue that there is not enough evidence to support the BUI charge. If key evidence is missing or unreliable, the prosecution may not be able to meet this burden of proof.
For instance, if no BAC test was conducted or if there were issues with the evidence collected, the defense might argue that the prosecution has not provided enough proof to convict the individual. This can be a powerful defense in cases where the evidence is weak or inconsistent. Without solid evidence, the court might be unable to find the accused guilty of BUI.
Facing a Boating Under the Influence (BUI) charge in South Carolina is a serious situation, and understanding the defenses available can make a big difference. From challenging the stop or questioning BAC and field sobriety tests to presenting medical conditions and environmental factors, a strong defense is essential for a fair trial. The Bateman Law Firm understands the complexities involved in BUI cases and can provide the guidance and support needed for the best possible outcome. If you or a loved one is dealing with a BUI charge, contact The Bateman Law Firm today to get the dedicated assistance you deserve.