If you are facing DUI charges in South Carolina but are from out of state, you might be feeling overwhelmed and unsure about how the legal process works in a state where you don’t live. It is completely normal to feel a sense of confusion and worry about what lies ahead. You are not alone in this situation, and we understand how stressful it can be to face these charges. At our firm, we are here to provide guidance and support through every step of the legal process, and we will work hard to help you achieve the best possible outcome for your case. There are several defenses available in South Carolina that can help reduce or even dismiss DUI charges, and understanding these options can be crucial as you navigate the courts. In this blog, we will take a closer look at some of the top defenses available for out-of-state DUI charges in South Carolina and how they might apply to your case.
Understanding DUI Charges in South Carolina
Before diving into the defenses, it is important to have a general understanding of DUI charges in South Carolina. DUI stands for Driving Under the Influence, and in South Carolina, a person can be charged with a DUI if they are found to be operating a vehicle while impaired by alcohol or drugs. The legal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit in South Carolina is 0.08 percent for drivers 21 years and older. Drivers under the age of 21 can be charged with DUI if their BAC is 0.02 percent or higher. DUI charges can carry serious consequences, including fines, license suspension, and possible jail time, which is why it’s important to mount a strong defense.
When you are an out-of-state driver, you may feel even more vulnerable because you are unfamiliar with how the South Carolina legal system works. However, it is important to know that your rights are the same as those of South Carolina residents, and there are several possible defenses that could help your case.
Challenging the Stop or Arrest
One of the most common and effective defenses in DUI cases is challenging the stop or arrest made by the police. In South Carolina, law enforcement must have a valid reason to stop your vehicle. This means that an officer cannot stop you simply because you are from out of state. There must be reasonable suspicion or probable cause for the stop. For example, if the officer claims to have stopped you due to erratic driving but cannot prove it with evidence such as dashcam footage or testimony from a witness, the stop may be deemed unlawful.
If the initial stop was unlawful, any evidence obtained after that stop, such as field sobriety tests or breathalyzer results, could potentially be thrown out of court. This defense can be particularly helpful if there are issues with the legality of the stop.
Field Sobriety Tests and Breathalyzer Issues
Field sobriety tests are commonly used by law enforcement officers to assess whether a driver is under the influence of alcohol or drugs. These tests include activities such as walking in a straight line or standing on one leg. While these tests are meant to be used as indicators of impairment, they are not always reliable. Several factors, such as medical conditions, fatigue, or even weather conditions, can influence a person’s ability to perform these tests correctly.
Similarly, breathalyzer tests are often used to determine a driver’s BAC. However, breathalyzer machines are not infallible, and several issues can affect their accuracy. For example, if the machine was not calibrated correctly or if the officer did not follow proper procedure during the test, the results could be inaccurate. Additionally, if the breathalyzer test was administered too soon or too late after your stop, it may not accurately reflect your BAC at the time you were driving.
Both of these tests—field sobriety tests and breathalyzer tests—can be challenged in court if there are inconsistencies or errors. If the court finds that the tests were not conducted properly or that they were unreliable, the evidence from these tests may be inadmissible, which can lead to a reduction or dismissal of the charges.
The Reliability of the Officer’s Observations
In many DUI cases, the prosecution will rely heavily on the observations of the arresting officer to prove that a driver was impaired. This can include observations such as the driver’s speech, the smell of alcohol, or their behavior during the stop. While officer observations can be persuasive, they are also subjective. An officer’s interpretation of your behavior or appearance may not necessarily reflect the reality of the situation.
For example, the officer might claim that you were slurring your speech or stumbling when you were not. You might also be accused of smelling like alcohol, even though you were not drinking. These subjective observations can be challenged in court, especially if there is conflicting evidence, such as witness testimony or surveillance footage, that shows you were not impaired at the time of the stop. In cases where the officer’s observations are questionable or unreliable, it may be possible to argue that the DUI charge should be dismissed.
Lack of Jurisdiction
Another important consideration for out-of-state drivers is the issue of jurisdiction. In most DUI cases, the state in which the offense occurred has jurisdiction over the case. However, if you are charged with a DUI in South Carolina but are from another state, there may be potential issues with how the case is handled. For example, if there are disputes over the procedures followed by law enforcement or if the case involves complex out-of-state legal questions, your lawyer may be able to argue that the case should be dismissed or transferred to another jurisdiction.
Related Videos
Refusing Field Sobriety Tests
Choosing a DUI Attorney
Additionally, there are times when a DUI charge may be contested on the grounds that the procedures followed by South Carolina law enforcement violated your rights under federal law. For instance, if South Carolina’s procedures for handling DUI cases are inconsistent with your home state’s laws or regulations, this could be a factor that weakens the prosecution’s case.
Improper Handling of Evidence
In any criminal case, the handling of evidence is crucial. For DUI charges, evidence such as breathalyzer results, blood tests, and field sobriety test results must be collected and handled properly. If there is any issue with the way evidence was collected, stored, or presented in court, it can be used as a defense to challenge the charges. For example, if your blood sample was not properly preserved or if it was mishandled, the evidence may be deemed inadmissible.
Similarly, if the prosecution cannot provide clear and consistent documentation of the evidence, such as the maintenance logs for breathalyzer equipment or the chain of custody for your blood sample, this can cast doubt on the reliability of the evidence and weaken the case against you.
Seeking Legal Help for Your Case
Facing DUI charges as an out-of-state driver can be intimidating, but you don’t have to go through this process alone. There are many defenses available, and having an experienced legal team on your side can make a huge difference in the outcome of your case. Our team understands the challenges you are facing, and we are committed to helping you navigate the South Carolina legal system with confidence.
We can carefully review the details of your case and explore all possible defenses to ensure that you receive a fair and just outcome. From challenging the legality of the stop to questioning the reliability of field sobriety tests and breathalyzer results, we are here to help you fight the charges against you. If you are facing out-of-state DUI charges in South Carolina, don’t wait—contact us today to discuss your case and learn more about how we can assist you. At Bateman Law Firm, we are here to stand by your side every step of the way.